Transaction fees are generated when your customers make purchases with branded cards. Learn how interchange revenue works and see how much you could earn.
Last updated:
July 24, 2024
In our guide, Revenues in Financial Features, we take a deep dive into the five main revenue streams and how fintech companies should think about them: interchange, interest, payments, financing, and software fees. This guide will focus on interchange, the fee that fintech companies generate after funds are spent from the cards they issue.
There are two reasons we’re choosing to focus on this topic. The obvious one is that in the absence of meaningful interest rates, interchange remains the most important revenue stream in fintech. Our model shows that fintech companies usually derive more than 75% of their revenues from interchange fees. Most companies that seek to issue cards therefore must understand and optimize the interchange they generate. Another reason we’re choosing to cover interchange is that the economics around it are still poorly explained and understood. We hope that this guide will change this.
If you are interested in offering a card product and seek advice on planning and maximizing your interchange revenue, this guide is for you. In the sections below, we’ll explain:
To help you understand the basics, we’ll use one example throughout this guide.
Joe has recently signed up for Outlay, a trendy new financial technology startup that launched recently to offer checking accounts and debit cards. He received his Visa debit card by mail and funded his Outlay account with $100. Joe walks into a Nike store to buy a pair of sneakers and uses his debit card to pay for the purchase. He swipes his card and pays $100. Nike, as the merchant, gets $97 for the sneakers. You can think of the other $3 as a processing fee that Nike pays for the ability to accept Joe’s card payment.
The $3 fee is actually split between many different parties, including Nike’s bank and even the maker of the physical terminal that the card was swiped at. One component of this fee is known as interchange, and that’s the component that goes back to Outlay, the financial technology company that issued Joe’s debit card. Think about interchange as roughly 1.5% of the purchase amount, or $1.50.
There’s a lot to unpack around this $1.50. Let’s get started.
In the above example, we assumed the interchange stands at 1.50%, but in reality the numbers vary. Interchange is always a small fraction of the amount spent, but this fraction varies from transaction to transaction.
So really, there is no way for Outlay to fully predict the interchange revenue that Joe’s card purchases will generate over time. However, to estimate its future revenues, Outlay may assume an average interchange of 1.50% for the purchases that Joe and other customers make.
To get a sense for how much interchange really varies, you can consider the long and complex interchange tables published by Visa and Mastercard.
Here are the most important variables that affect interchange and that Outlay should consider:
Individual cards have significantly lower interchange fees than business cards. Throughout this guide and for your future modeling, we encourage you to assume the following:
If Joe ran a small business as a basketball coach and used a business debit card on the business’s name to buy the same Nike sneakers as a business expense, the interchange would have been roughly $2.40 instead of $1.50.
If you read the interchange tables we mentioned above, you’ll notice that interchange is composed of two components: (1) percentage from the purchase amount (2) a small fixed amount.
For example, one line in the Visa interchange table reads as follows: 2.50% + $0.10. Consider the effect that the fixed amount ($0.10) has, depending on the purchase amount:
This means that smaller transactions generate higher interchange as a percentage of purchase amount (3.50% in a smaller purchase compared to 2.60% in a larger purchase).
Online card purchases generate higher interchange fees than offline card purchases, in order to “compensate” the issuing institution for potential fraud risk. If Joe made the exact same purchase at Nike’s online store and not a physical store, the interchange would have been roughly $1.60 instead of $1.50.
Based on the concept of Merchant Category Codes (or MCC), purchases at certain merchants may generate less interchange. For example, purchases at merchants that belong to a specific category (“Grocery Stores, Supermarkets”) could generate less interchange. If Joe made the exact same purchase at his local supermarket, the interchange could have been $1.10 instead of $1.50.
Debit cards have lower interchange fees than credit cards due to lower credit risk for the issuing institution. As a rule of thumb, the difference stands at 0.50%. If the card Joe used was an Outlay credit card, the interchange would have been roughly $2.00 instead of $1.50.
Even though the brand on Joe’s card (and Nike’s terminal) is Visa, some offline transactions like Joe’s purchase at the Nike store may be routed to a second network you probably haven’t heard of, such as Accel or Interlink. Those networks tend to have unique interchange rates. Joe could walk into another physical shop that happens to use one of them, and his purchase would generate a different interchange.
Large merchants (like Walmart or Amazon) have enough influence to close bespoke deals with the card networks. If Joe made the exact same purchase at Walmart and not Nike, the interchange could have been $1.30 instead of $1.50, leaving Walmart with more and Outlay with less.
In the US, large banks (such as Chase or Citi) get much lower interchange than smaller banks. In simple terms, banks with less than $10b in total deposits have access to numbers like the 1.50% above, while bigger banks like Chase will see less than 0.30% if they issued Joe’s card. This huge difference is the result of a specific regulatory change that was enacted after the 2008 financial crisis, in an attempt to strengthen smaller banks in the US. The change is known as The Durbin Amendment within the Dodd-Frank Act.
If Joe used his Chase debit card for the exact same purchase, Chase would get $0.30- significantly less than Outlay. Companies like Outlay therefore choose to partner with smaller banks to maximize interchange.
So far, we discussed the variable nature of interchange and explained that every transaction generates a certain interchange that goes back to Outlay. This includes the $1.50 for Joe’s purchase at Nike. This amount is known as the raw interchange.
In our example, Outlay is technically a financial technology company and not a bank, as are Chime, Current and others. Outlay will get to keep part of the $1.50 in raw interchange- typically the majority- but how much exactly will be determined by the type of infrastructure it’s built on.
There are 2 common infrastructure options, and we’ll explain both of them next.
If Outlay was started before 2018, it’s very likely that it was built on a bank relationship that involves the use of a middleware component.
As our guide to banking infrastructure explains, this means working with at least one bank partner, owning a large set of compliance activities, and cobbling together 13 infrastructure components on average. Those components include:
There are many costs to that legacy setup, including engineering, fraud, legal, day-to-day management challenges and the lower flexibility that’s inherent to working with multiple vendors. Importantly, it also has a strong impact on the interchange economics, since Outlay has to share the raw interchange of $1.50 with 4 different companies:
What happens next is that all the above companies take their share from the raw interchange. What’s left at the end of this process is the net interchange.
Typically, bank partners let companies like Outlay keep 70-90% of the net interchange. Let’s assume that Outlay has a great deal that lets it keep 90% at scale.
Interestingly, the bank partner also “double dips”; it takes a piece of the raw interchange (e.g. $0.10) and then also shares in the net interchange (e.g. 10%, while Outlay keeps 90%).
Outlay will have to negotiate a per-transaction fee directly with all the above companies, and the deals it is able to get depend mostly on volume. Even in the most competitive environments, the different per-transaction fees add up to an inefficient value chain that typically looks like this:
In this option, the final interchange that Outlay keeps from Joe’s purchase at Nike is $0.98, or 90% of the net interchange of $1.09.
Platforms like Unit represent a newer generation of infrastructure.
As our guide to banking infrastructure explains, platforms are a complete solution that lets Outlay open bank accounts and issue cards. They’ll help Outlay partner directly with a bank, streamline compliance (e.g., PCI-DSS requirements), and expose a modern API / Dashboard that Outlay could use to build its product and run its day-to-day operations.
The integrated nature of platforms helps companies like Outlay go to market faster and get support from experts for key fraud/compliance responsibilities. Importantly, it greatly improves the interchange economics, since Outlay has to share the raw interchange with two entities, instead of four:
Platforms typically let companies like Outlay keep 70-80% of the net interchange. Let’s assume that Outlay has a great deal that lets it keep 80% at scale.
With platforms, net interchange is calculated differently, which favors Outlay. The net interchange is what you get after deducting the card network fee (Visa) and the platform’s at-cost processing fee. Platforms may need to pay an underlying processor, but their relationship with the processor is optimized for cost, which typically ends up being less than $0.02. This number will go into our calculation, but as you’ll see, it ends up having a very minimal effect on the net interchange.
Given the above, the interchange economics typically look like this:
In this option, the final interchange that Outlay keeps from Joe’s purchase at Nike is $1.06, or 80% of the net interchange of $1.33.
It’s worth pausing and reflecting on the difference in outcomes for Outlay between the two options above:
The result is that Outlay keeps $1.06, or 8% more, by choosing a platform. In our example, Joe spent a relatively large amount ($100) on the sneakers. In the case of smaller transactions, the difference can be as large as 50%. If Joe made a $50 sneaker purchase, Outlay would keep $0.46 vs $0.31, or 50% more, by choosing a platform.
Whether Outlay was built on a platform + bank or on a middleware, it has one last business decision to make: what should it do with the interchange it earned?
Assume the final interchange that Outlay keeps for Joe’s purchase is $1.06. Here are some examples of what may happen next:
The infrastructure that Outlay is built on plays a big role in achieving the above. Here are things you should consider around infrastructure and interchange economics:
As we mentioned above, there are many variables that impact per-transaction interchange. Some variables, like the balance between online and offline transactions, are hard to control or predict.
However, there are a few tips you can implement that will greatly impact your interchange revenue:
If you are considering offering cards as part of your product offering, we hope this guide has helped you navigate interchange and how to think about maximizing interchange revenue. We explained:
We also encourage you to revisit our blog post on Revenues in Financial Features and use our free Revenue Calculator.
If you are interested in learning more about how Unit can help you build banking faster, contact us to book a demo or sign up for sandbox.
Originally published:
September 29, 2021
Check out our guides page to learn more about embedded finance